Sunday, November 10, 2019
Describe the position of black people in the USA in 1945 Essay
Blacks in the USA in 1945 were not considered as equal; the treatment of people was based on their skin colour, a practice that had been going on for many years before, even after the Reconstruction of society after the Civil War in which the blacks were ââ¬Å"liberatedâ⬠from slavery. In theory, blacks were free to work and live where they wanted, but the figures at the time told a different story: by 1960, around 17% of the workforce of ââ¬Å"white-collarâ⬠workers, i. e. professional, technical, administration, etc., were blacks, while the whites remained the majority at 47%. The ââ¬Å"blue-collarâ⬠work, such as craftsmen, manual labourers, etc. ââ¬â jobs that are renowned for needing less skill and education ââ¬â had 40% of the workforce as blacks, and 36% were whites. Blacks just werenââ¬â¢t provided the education and qualifications to do the professional types of work due to separation of black and white facilities. Not only were they held back at getting the higher-class jobs, they were paid less for the same work that whites did; in 1950, blacks earned about 53% of a whites wage. This figure remained the same over the next 20 years, with it rising 11% to blacks earning 64% of a whites wage. All over the USA, blacks were discriminated against in almost all areas of life, whether it is the law of the state, or just by the custom of the local society. After the abolishment of slavery, slaves had the choice of moving away from their former homes and having their own lives; unfortunately, many blacks didnââ¬â¢t have any money to move halfway across the USA to the northern states that had fought to free them. Those who did have the finance to travel rarely had enough money afterwards to sustain a good quality of life after they had moved. The custom of de facto came into play in some of the Northern states; ghettos and places where the majority of the population were black sprung up in towns and cities. Segregation by custom in the North was contrasted with segregation by law, or de jure, in the South- Jim Crow laws forbade blacks, for example, to enter white facilities, or sit on buses with whites, etc. Places where de facto was in force came up with other ways to separate blacks from whites to keep the Southern order of things; ââ¬Å"red liningâ⬠was when banks were not allowed to give money for mortgages if they suspected it would be a risky investment- if a black family moved into a certain area, it would lower the prices of the surrounding houses. This meant that places such as ghettos were built up, when the majority of the population were black. This type of segregation wasnââ¬â¢t by law, but by custom, blacks werenââ¬â¢t forced to live in ââ¬Å"blackâ⬠areas, but they felt pressured to live in certain places because of the practises such as red lining in effect. Although it is in the Constitution that everyone is equal and has the same civil rights, it is beliefs like red lining that push a wedge between races; it may not seem constitutional, but it is up to the Supreme Court in the USA to decide what is constitutional. They decided that slavery was lawful mainly due the fact that the Southern states economy was based on slavery; they were needed to produce cotton, the main export in the 19th century. Without them, the economy would have fallen apart. After the 13th amendment to the Constitution, slavery was no longer legal, but the Supreme Court still remained to overlook state laws that continued discrimination and practices that could be seen as worse then slavery- for example, the Ku Klux Klan were allowed to terrorise and lynch blacks, yet lynching was not made illegal. ââ¬Å"The Supreme Court declared that the 14th amendment forbids states, but not citizens, from discriminatingâ⬠(1) Separate facilities for blacks and whites were considered as the solution to the discrimination problem; the Supreme Court believed that the blacks were ââ¬Å"separate but equalâ⬠when they were forced to use different buildings, transport, schools and hospitals then the whites. Since the Supreme Court approved laws and could declare them unconstitutional if they wanted to, they were the ones who the blacks has to convince if they wanted to change anything; in legal cases, the trial had to be taken to the Supreme Court to have any impact, since the State Courts were always going to be in favour of the Jim Crow laws. The Plessy vs. Ferguson (1896) case was when Homer Plessy refused to sit in the ââ¬Å"colouredâ⬠car of a train and sat in the ââ¬Å"whiteâ⬠section instead. The case went to Supreme Court, and they ruled that Plessy was guilty and sentenced him to pay a fine or go to jail. This was considered the most shameful ruling of the Supreme Court in history; it shows the extent of the discrimination against blacks, even after slavery was abolished- even though Plessy was 1/8 black and 7/8 white, he was still considered as black in the eyes of the Louisiana law. Although many people thought that this ruling was shocking, there wasnââ¬â¢t much that could be done, since they did not have a definite leader to show them what the do; everything that the movement did was relatively unorganised, with maybe one person leading the others. People such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Booker T. Washington tried to unite blacks under one leadership, but it did not work, because everyone has different opinion on what should be done about the discrimination problem. Dr Martin King Jr. was a black leader that advocated peaceful resistance; because of this, many whites accepted him because they knew that he would not cause violence, but blacks did not like this as peaceful protest could only take them so far- they felt that King was weaker then some of the other extremist black leaders, such as Malcolm X. Kingââ¬â¢s approach to fighting against their oppression wasnââ¬â¢t enough to keep the blacks following him; they preferred people who were willing to do more for the benefit of all blacks. Another leader who was thought as weak by fellow blacks was Booker T. Washington; he was accused of being an accommodationist to the whites, as he wasnââ¬â¢t campaigning for equal civil rights, he was concentrating on equal job opportunities- this wasnââ¬â¢t what the blacks were fighting for; they wanted to be free to do what the whites could do, not only in jobs but in other aspects of life too. The leaders of the movement were not united, therefore they were not strong- many leaders were critical of others, for example, W. E. B DuBois criticised Washington, saying that blacks cannot get social equality if they do not get political equality first. The New Deal is a phrase used to explain the actions taken after Black Tuesday when the US Stock market crashed to stop the effects of the Depression disturbing the lives of the public. Laws were passed to help stop the consequences of the Depression becoming a long-term problem; within the first hundred days, President Roosevelt passed a law that lowered workerââ¬â¢s salaries and pensions by up to 15%- a move that people did not like, yet it saved a lot of money for the government. Another act was passed that stated that the government could inspect banks before letting them open again so they could see if the bank was eligible to lend and hold money. This prevented banks lending out money that they did not have, therefore they did not losing money for their customers and wouldnââ¬â¢t have to close, as they would have to have done if they did lend out money they didnââ¬â¢t have. The New Deal was produced so the government could help all of those that were affected by the Depression; this helped the blacks because they were some of the poorest people in the USA at the time, and as many as 8% of blacks were unemployed in 1955. For the blacks, the New Deal slightly improved their way of living as it was designed to help everyone without discrimination. Soon after New Deal was set up, the situation for blacks was improved socially by the outbreak of the Second World War. When the Americans were brought into the war, they needed as many men as they could to fight; blacks had regiments where they could join and be equal to whites, but they still were not allowed to belong to the same regiment as the whites- there were some who did, but they were rare, they normally belonged to an all-black regiment. At the end of the war, the blacks got more ambitious; they were allowed to fight for their country, but America wasnââ¬â¢t even grateful enough of them to let them be equal. This would have enraged African Americans since they had fought so hard to be a part of America, so the Civil Rights movement activity increased, which put pressure on the government to do something. The Nazi ideology also pushed the government into action, because what the Americans were doing to the blacks could be compared to the Germans discriminating against the Jews in Germany; the blacks realised this, so demanded equality, as they didnââ¬â¢t want the same to happen to them. In conclusion, the position of blacks in 1945 was not equal to whites: even after a century of supposed ââ¬Å"freedomâ⬠from slavery, blacks were still treated as inferiors to whites. Laws and acts were in effect that encouraged the discrimination of blacks. Amendments such as the rights for blacks to vote and the rights for them to be equal were passed, but there were so many other laws that cancelled them out. Jim Crow laws in the South and practises such as ââ¬Å"red liningâ⬠in the North made it impossible for blacks to be seen as equal politically, whilst rebellions by extremist whites and groups such as the Ku Klux Klan stopped blacks gaining any social standing or equality. Blacks were supposed to be equal, but by 1945, some may comment that the position of them was worse then slavery, as the blacks were on their own in there poverty and discrimination; before, they had their slave owners who would clothe and feed them to keep productive workers- they would never be out on the streets as slaves, but as ââ¬Å"freeâ⬠people, they received basically no help. Things that whites took for granted, such as clean and good-quality facilities, and jobs that are fair and just are things that blacks counted themselves lucky if they managed to get any equality. People like Martin Luther King Jr. and W. E. B. DuBois tried to get equality, both through violence and peaceful means, but it didnââ¬â¢t have much effect to the political and social standing of blacks. The discrimination of blacks continued right into the 20th century, even up into the 21st century. It was slow going for the blacksââ¬â¢ right to equality, but actions by both blacks and whites changed things for the better. However, in 1945, blacks were not considered as equal, but as 3/5s of a human being. Bibliography: (1) http://www. alternativeinsight. com/Reparations-Slavery. html Field, Ron; ââ¬Å"Civil Rights in America 1865-1980â⬠; Cambridge University Press http://www. lawbuzz. com/can_you/plessy/plessy. htm http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/New_Deal.
Friday, November 8, 2019
s History
THE SENECA FALLS CONVENTION In July 1848, on the initiative of Mott and Stanton, the first womenââ¬â¢s rights convention met at a Wesleyan church chapel in Seneca Falls, New York. Between 100 and 300 people attended the convention, among them many male sympathizers. After serious discussion of proposed means to achieve their ends, the delegates finally agreed that the primary goal should be attainment of the franchise. The convention then adopted a Declaration of Sentiments patterned after the American Declaration of Independence. Public reaction to the Seneca Falls convention presaged a stormy future for the new movement. Although many prominent Americans, including the famed editor Horace Greeley and the abolitionist leader William Lloyd Garrison, warmly supported it, many citizens and the great majority of newspapers responded with ridicule, fury, and vilification. Suffragists were called the shrieking sisterhood, branded as unfeminine, and accused of immorality and drunkenness. Later, when suffragist leaders undertook speaking tours in support of womenââ¬â¢s rights, temperance, and abolition, they were often subjected to physical violence. Meetings repeatedly were stormed and disrupted by gangs of street bullies. On one occasion when Anthony spoke in Albany, New York, the city mayor sat on the rostrum brandishing a revolver to discourage possible attacks by hoodlums in the audience. Despite intimidation, the woman-suffrage and abolitionist movements continued for some years to grow side by side. V AFTER THE CIVIL WAR Bitter disagreements over strategy engendered a schism between the suffragist and abolitionist groups after the American Civil War. Many male abolitionists voiced fears that the demands of women suffragists might impede the campaign to gain voting rights for male ex-slaves. The issue came to a head in 1868, when the abolitionists pressed for a constitutional amendment enfranchising all Americans regardless of rac... 's History Free Essays on Women\'s History THE SENECA FALLS CONVENTION In July 1848, on the initiative of Mott and Stanton, the first womenââ¬â¢s rights convention met at a Wesleyan church chapel in Seneca Falls, New York. Between 100 and 300 people attended the convention, among them many male sympathizers. After serious discussion of proposed means to achieve their ends, the delegates finally agreed that the primary goal should be attainment of the franchise. The convention then adopted a Declaration of Sentiments patterned after the American Declaration of Independence. Public reaction to the Seneca Falls convention presaged a stormy future for the new movement. Although many prominent Americans, including the famed editor Horace Greeley and the abolitionist leader William Lloyd Garrison, warmly supported it, many citizens and the great majority of newspapers responded with ridicule, fury, and vilification. Suffragists were called the shrieking sisterhood, branded as unfeminine, and accused of immorality and drunkenness. Later, when suffragist leaders undertook speaking tours in support of womenââ¬â¢s rights, temperance, and abolition, they were often subjected to physical violence. Meetings repeatedly were stormed and disrupted by gangs of street bullies. On one occasion when Anthony spoke in Albany, New York, the city mayor sat on the rostrum brandishing a revolver to discourage possible attacks by hoodlums in the audience. Despite intimidation, the woman-suffrage and abolitionist movements continued for some years to grow side by side. V AFTER THE CIVIL WAR Bitter disagreements over strategy engendered a schism between the suffragist and abolitionist groups after the American Civil War. Many male abolitionists voiced fears that the demands of women suffragists might impede the campaign to gain voting rights for male ex-slaves. The issue came to a head in 1868, when the abolitionists pressed for a constitutional amendment enfranchising all Americans regardless of rac...
Tuesday, November 5, 2019
How to Write a Dissertation Proposal
How to Write a Dissertation Proposal How to Write a Dissertation Proposal Several guidelines are provided to enable an individual to write an excellent dissertation proposal. Here they are for your attention. They should be well detailed regarding the research topic. Current research shows that to be able to write a good dissertation proposal, students have to be well conversant with the topic at hand. This means that they need to gain a lot of information on the subject matter by reading several materials and books on the topic, know current findings on the topic and be able to access various literary sources. They should be able to go outside the area of study. This mainly means that they will be able to research from related topics and as a result, the research work presented will be unique, thus outdoing previous research on the subject matter. The issue of going outside the given area of study is an advantage in that it is a good source of new ideas for a given area of study. They have to be attentive. The issue of attention is a very powerful tool, especially, in the practical application of knowledge gained. In addition, it helps individuals to know the various methods, as well as the procedures, used in a given analysis. This then becomes a great source of information for the broad topic of study. They should know how to cite papers. For instance, an individual who knows the list of authors who wrote a particular article would give a great referenced dissertation proposal paper. In addition, having a good knowledge in the area of text citations would result to a great dissertation proposal. They should be creative. When a researcher is able to refer to research papers that were written previously and come up with new ideas, the outcome document becomes of greater value in comparison to earlier documents. Below is the suggested format that should be used in the writing of a dissertation proposal: A clear formulation of the research question at hand. Justifying the Research Project. Writing a literature review. Compiling conceptual and theoretical research work. Stating the research methodology. Giving a detailed research plan that indicates how the various research stages will be carried out. Budget and Time factor. References together with appendices. Do always remember that, in case you fail to compose a dissertation proposal on your own and the deadline is due in a very short period of time, you can always contact the custom writing agency for help. Proficient writers will rescue you if you are in need and you will get a carefully composed paper within the time you had indicated to them. Do you still need dissertation proposal help online? You can hire our PhD writers who will write a custom proposal for your dissertation. Try our writing service now!
Sunday, November 3, 2019
Vegetarian Diets Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words
Vegetarian Diets - Essay Example In looking at the dietary construction of a vegetarian lifestyle, the purpose of the choice is as important as the results of that choice. The choice to avoid animal products can have benefits to the body and also contribute positively to the environmental impact that processing animal products has on the Earth. There are categories of vegetarianism in which food choices are eliminated according to the decisions that an individual makes about their eating habits. Maurer defines a lifestyle that still includes some animal products such as fish and dairy as a semi-vegetarian lifestyle. An ovo-lacto vegetarian will not consume fish, but still consume eggs and dairy. A vegan will eat nothing that comes from animals and limit their intake to those products that come from plant life. Vegans will typically not use any product that comes from an animal for any purpose in their life, including wearing clothing that has an animal based textile. The choice to be vegan is very often as much a social choice as it is a nutritional choice. Becoming fully vegan is very difficult in the modern world as even something as simple as a magazine will use gluten as a part of the process of creating the photographs within its pages (Maurer xxi). Maurer contends that vegetarianism should become social because vegetarian groups are essential to having the latest information on ways in which animal products are used in daily life. Although the social issues that surround vegetarianism are important, Maurer states that ââ¬Å"In North America, most people begin the path to vegetarianism for health reasonsâ⬠(4). She further quotes from a study done by Yankelovich, Clancy and Shulman conducted in 1992 in which 46% of those interviewed chose vegetarianism for health reasons, 15% for animal rights reasons, 12 percent for other ethical reasons, and the remaining for
Friday, November 1, 2019
Routine shaving Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words
Routine shaving - Research Paper Example This model of hair removal should be changed or replaced, as it presents the potential risks of susceptibility to skin damage like razor burns, scrapes, cuts or nicks. This model also, involves the cutting of body hair below or at the plane of the skin, often leaving pointed follicles, which cause irritation during the time of re-growing. Due to the effect of bruising the skin, where there is the development of cuts, scrapes, or nicks ââ¬â increase the incidences of surgical site infections (SSIs), which may lead to further, post-surgical effects, like delayed wound healing, extended hospital stays, unnecessary pain, and in extreme cases, the patientââ¬â¢s death ââ¬â which may be expensive or difficult to treat (Miller et al., 2001). 2. a) The core of surgical shaving can be traced to the traditional medical observances. The roots of the practice are difficult to trace, due to the lack of proper documentation, but from all leads ââ¬â it drew from the antiseptic practic es introduced into medical practice by Ignaz Semmelweis and Joseph Lister in the 19th century. A case here is the observation of Dr. Stephen Smith, in the 1850s, that surgeons at the Bellevue hospital in New York administered the practice (Altman, 1983). The basis for the practice was presented by the Norwegian Centre for Health Technology Assessment, which carried out a methodical review on preoperative hair removal and published its report in 2002. The search for the review took place between 1999 and 2002, featuring both observational and randomized studies. At the facility, like the case is, with other facilities, the determination of the practice of preoperative shaving was reached by the hospital infection center, which is outlined through its working party guidelines. This authority is also responsible for proposing the change of the practice as deemed fit. The evidence in support of ââ¬â not removing body hairs before operation was based on the information from observati onal inquiries only. According to their findings, preference was offered to clipping, as it presents less risk of surgical wound infection. The study, further, offered preference to depilation ââ¬â as opposed to shaving, where moderate evidence from randomized studies and observational inquiries ââ¬â which indicated that the timing for the removal of body hair should be administered, only a few minutes or a short duration before the surgery (Kjonniksen, 2002; Fogg, 1999). b). The rationale for routine shaving of the surgical site before surgery was implemented, as it is viewed as a mode of reducing the level of exposure, of the surgery area, both at the time of incision and in accessing the wound area after the surgery. For instance, the presence of hairs at the operation area may interfere with the suturing of the opening. It may also interfere with the dressing of the surgical wound and the administration of adhesive drapes. The presence of hair at the surgical site is als o associated to a lack of cleanliness, and may also interference with the process of administering cleaning, before the surgery or after the practice. As a result, the removal of such hairs is perceived as capable of reducing the instances of reducing the incidences of site surgical infection, due to the dirt and the infecting agents that may hide at the haired area (Hallstrom & Beck, 1993). c). The reason as to why the hair removal practice is administered in this way is that it offers an effective mode of hair removal, as the hairs are cut either at the surface or below
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
Why English Colonization Never Succeeded Roanoke Research Paper
Why English Colonization Never Succeeded Roanoke - Research Paper Example Spain was on the lead during that time especially in colonizing the West in lieu of propagating the Catholic faith and cramming for the western abundance making them even more powerful in their pursuit of colonizing as many lands as they can. On the other hand, Anglican England would never settle the dispute against Spain but rather made a way in pursuit of finding a new Eden in the western land in finding abundance the same way Spain was having. Hence, on March 25 of 1584, Walter Ralegh secured from Queen Elizabeth a patent which granted him the exclusive right to establish a colony in remote and heathen barbarous lands, countries and territories that were not actually possessed by any Christian prince or inhabited by Christian people.1 In pursuit of a great land that would suffice the criteria that the English monarchy had been looking for, England had set forth a mission to scout for a land that fitted the criteria. As a first step toward pursuing this grand ambition in finding a new settlement in the west, Ralegh commissioned Arthur Barlowe and Philip Amadas to scout a location for the settlement and have found Roanoke Island to be promising with its great and untouched abundance. Roanoke was thought to be perfect and was chosen because it offered protection from Spanish assaults and at the same time it could cradle as a base for launching raids that they had been pursuing for some time to raid Spanish ships and rob them of the good materials they carried. Many great things were written about Roanoke especially by the early colonial settlers that had reached the island. They thought that they successfully penetrated the island but the first land was far from what they expected. The colonizing pursuit never came into realization though no obvious resentment was made by the natives at first because the English colonizers took the process abruptly and dominatingly hurried up to surpass the Spaniards as things were not made with plan but with urge that ignited two different worlds living in misunderstanding and with barriers. Ralph Lane describes Roanoke as having the goodliest soil under the scope of heaven, which is abundant with sweet trees that bring sundry rich and most pleasant fruits compared to Europeââ¬â¢s France, Italy and Spain. Moreover, Lane described it had many sorts of apothecary drugs and food resources such as wheat. Early colonists such as Lane were easily so blinded by the land greatness that they described it as a land of unknown greatness due to the many discoveries that they made during their first step into the savage land. Due to its geographical location and difference from Europe, the climate was very different and was found to be amazing. They found a land of great abundance but claimed that that abundance was hidden from its use since savages resided at the place that they described as being courteous and eager to have clothes rather than silk.2 The early and original settlers of Roanoke before the coloniza tion attempts were Native American Indians. And the whole island was not just actually under one rule with different groups, but with a set of different leaders that did not follow one particular rule. Though the first step of the European colonizers came out well with the first natives that they saw upon touching the grounds of the newly found land, this accommodation did not imply the totality of the native Indians dwelling in the island. The native settlers were likewise awestruck by the coming of foreign strangers and were also amazed by the abundance the outsiders brought in the island, which they had never seen before. Trade instantly came into place as
Monday, October 28, 2019
Uses of Internet in Banking Essay Example for Free
Uses of Internet in Banking Essay Online banking is a technological advancement that has brought about such a change. The banking industry has adopted virtual banking to improve business process, infrastructure, and customer relationships. These changes have had a major impact on the banking business, but more transparently on the customers of online banking. The matrix measures for the improvements added by online banking can be evaluated on comparable levels of service, efficiency and cost satisfaction, for both the provider and consumer of this technology.E-banking has had a considerable impact on todays banking business. Banking activities such as; account inquiries, depositing or transferring funds and ordering checks, can now be done remotely, 24 hours a day and seven days a week Banking through the internet (Online) provides customers with a variety of services that are either free or have a minimal fee . The advantages of online banking to customers can be summed up with five words; convenience, ubiquity, transaction speed, efficiency, and effectiveness. Online banking is more convenient and ubiquitous for consumers because the internet is open 24 hours, and can be accessed from anywhere in the world. Transactions are in most cases as fast as clicking buttons on ones computer screen, and often faster than ATM processing. Banking online is more efficient because bankers can access and manage multiple accounts through one online bank account. Online customers are able to take advantage of simple features that enable them to check balances, transfer funds between multiple accounts, pay bills through the automated process of direct billing, and use direct deposit for faster processing of paychecks. Banking online also offers new sophisticated tools to manage assets, read stock quotes and rate alerts, apply for loans and to change or update account information through the use of online forms. Still, some traditional bankers are weary of online services despite its notable rewards. For instance, security worries of identity theft keep many from banking online. Banks also advertise various types of loans, investment accounts and insurance products that are easy to purchase or open with an online application. The growing use of new credit scoring software allows banks to advertise a guaranteed answer or 24 hour approval on such applications. E-tools for conducting such services have completely changed old banking processes, and provide new, more convenient ways of banking, that Banks are using to lure customers into their business. The customers of online banking reap many benefits from the added convenience of online banking, but the nature of banking has completely changed and requires new skills. For instance, basic personal computer skills are a must for bankers wanting to enter the online banking world. Bankers will now need to be able to maneuver through the numerous tabs, buttons and icons on their computers, to be able to access their accounts, and complete transactions. Officials of the Internet-only bank, BankDirect, acknowledge that banking online is a service best suited to computer-savvy clientele. A look into the future of the banking industry shows that banks are not moving away from virtual banking, but are instead promoting new uses of online service, and improving the existing features. Banks world wide are implementing the use of online services to better their business efficiency, and bankers all over the world are looking for these efficient services to become available to them. As online banking attracts more and more customers through industrial innovations and improvements, it is a clear sign that the internet is the future place for banking business.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)